College of Business
 
Windows Information Systems/Decision Sciences
IS PhD

ISDS PhD Handbook

 

Unless otherwise stated, in the document below “doctoral committee” will mean the ISDS Department Doctoral Committee. This committee consists of all the tenured/tenure-track members of the ISDS Department.

 

Program Structure for the ISDS PhD Program

 

This document is in six parts:

 

Part 1: Course requirements

Part 2: Research requirements before admission to candidacy

Part 3: Teaching requirements

Part 4: Comprehensive examinations

Part 5: After the comprehensive examinations

Part 6: Performance evaluation

 

 

 

 

 

1. Course Requirements:

 

Foundation Courses:

 

0-4 business courses

            Four foundational courses in Accounting, Finance, Management and Marketing are needed.

            These may be waived based on prior coursework as described in the COBA PhD handbook.

 

Core courses:

 

A. The following graduate IS courses are required for all graduating ISDS PhD students. This requirement can be waived if a student has taken these or equivalent graduate courses in a prior program.

(i)   ISM 6124: Advanced Systems Analysis and Design

(ii)  ISM 6218: Advanced Database Management

(iii) ISM 6225: Distributed Information Systems

 

B. Two graduate Economics courses

            See COBA PhD handbook for the required economics courses and waiver conditions.

 

C. Three quantitative courses, plus an additional research elective. The following three courses will satisfy the three quantitative course requirement for ISDS doctoral students:

(i)   QMB 6375 Applied Linear Statistical Models

(ii)  QMB 7566 Applied Multivariate Statistical Methods

(iii) QMB 7565 Introduction to Research Methods

           

D. Five courses in the major field (at 6000 level or higher).

(i) ISM/QMB XXXX: Computational Methods for Research. The course will be a new course based on the principles of computing and search, and will present seminal methods in logic, optimization, machine learning, simulation, agent-based modeling and game theory. The course will first be offered as a special topics course under ISM or QMB. For ISDS doctoral students this course cannot be used to count towards the additional research elective course required under (C) above.

(ii)  ISM 7910 Conceptual Foundations

(iii) ISM 7912 Seminar in IS Organizational Research

(iv) ISM 7911 Seminar in MIS Technical Research

(v)  One additional ISM course at the 6000 level or higher. Note that any of the three courses taken to satisfy (A) above can also satisfy this (fifth major course) requirement.

Also note that QMB 7565 Introduction to Research Methods is also a key research methods course for ISDS students, but this will count towards the “quantitative course” requirement above, and hence cannot be included as part of the five courses required for the major field.

 

E. Three courses in a support area.

Can be any three graduate courses taken in one or more related fields such as Economics, Computer Science, Psychology, Industrial Engineering, Marketing, Accounting, Finance and Management. These courses should be chosen in consultation with the advisor or ISDS doctoral coordinator.

 

F. Other course/credit requirements that must be satisfied prior to graduation:

(i) Need at least 21 hours enrolled in dissertation credits. Note that students may register for dissertation hours only after they are admitted to candidacy. Admission to candidacy normally occurs after the student has passed all parts (written and oral) of the comprehensive examinations. See the COBA doctoral handbook on rules pertaining to admission to candidacy.

(ii) Need at least 90 graduate semester hours after the undergraduate degree, at least 45 of which must be at USF. In addition to courses, students can satisfy the 90 hour requirement by:

·        Registering for dissertation credits.

·        Registering for “Directed Research” (independent study) courses in the department.

(iii) Continuous enrollment requirement. Students who have not yet graduated are expected to be continuously enrolled for a certain number of dissertation credits each semester as noted in the COBA and USF graduate handbooks.

 

An adequate grade will be defined as a B grade or higher for courses in which A through F letter grades are awarded, and as an S grade for courses in which either an S or U are awarded. If a student does not receive an adequate grade for a completed course, this will be considered making “unsatisfactory progress” in the doctoral program. Students making unsatisfactory progress will be evaluated by the doctoral committee as described in this document.

 

2. Research Requirements Before Admission to Candidacy

Paper Requirements

Students are strongly encouraged to start early in their pursuit of their research interests. To this end, students are required to write two research papers in their first two years.

 

A. First-Year Paper: The first research paper is expected to be co-authored with the student's advisor(s).  Evidence of satisfactory completion of this requirement is made by the collaborating faculty member to the Ph.D. coordinator. The paper has to be submitted to the Ph.D. coordinator by September 1st of the student’s second year. Students are encouraged to submit this paper to at least a conference during their second year.

 

B. Second-Year Paper: The second research paper is expected to be more independent with the student being the lead author. The paper has to be submitted to the Ph.D. coordinator by September 1st of the student’s third year and also presented to the departmental faculty and doctoral students during early Fall of the student’s third year.  Evidence of satisfactory completion of this requirement is made by via a positive assessment by faculty that the student has completed this requirement.

 

Students who have not completed these research papers on schedule will be considered making “unsatisfactory progress” in the doctoral program.

 

Departmental Participation

Students are expected to attend all departmental activities relevant to the doctoral program, as determined by the department chair and Ph.D. coordinator.  These activities typically include invited speakers, research seminars and presentations, job talks by faculty candidates, and meetings with potential doctoral students. Students who fail to participate will be considered making “unsatisfactory progress” in the doctoral program.

 

Research Assistantship

Each semester funded doctoral students are expected to work as research assistants to assigned faculty members. Funded students are encouraged to use these assignments to work closely with the faculty and advance their research. Based on consultations with the appropriate faculty the PhD coordinator will inform the department chair if any student’s performance in these assignments was unsatisfactory. Students who receive such unsatisfactory evaluations will be considered making “unsatisfactory progress” in the doctoral program.

 

 

3. Teaching Requirements

 

Students funded by USF assistantships are expected to teach one course per semester from their second year onwards.  Evidence of satisfactory teaching performance is made based on course evaluations and feedback by the course coordinator to the department chair. Students may be asked to attend courses in the Teaching Enhancement Program and/or observe the course coordinator’s classes and/or work with the course coordinator on how to improve their teaching performance. Receiving unsatisfactory evaluations or negative feedback will be considered making “unsatisfactory progress” in the doctoral program.

 

 

4. Comprehensive Examinations

 

There are two parts to the comprehensive examinations: (i) a written examination and (ii) an oral presentation and successful defense of the second year research paper. Students will be considered to have passed the comprehensive exam if they pass the written exam and successfully present and defend their second year paper.

 

The written examination will have six parts. Five of these parts will be based on the following five required courses: the two departmental research methods courses (Introduction to Research Methods and Computational Methods for Research), the Conceptual Foundations course and the two departmental seminar courses (Seminar in IS Organizational Research and Seminar in MIS Technical Research). In addition, the sixth part of the exam will test IS domain knowledge and will typically be based on the three required graduate IS courses listed previously in this document in section (A) under “Course Requirements – Core Courses”.

 

By the end of the first (Fall/Spring) semester following the completion of the required research methods and departmental coursework (and no later than the end of the fourth year) students should have passed both parts of the comprehensive examinations.  For funded doctoral students this will normally occur during the Fall semester of their third year.

 

Qualifications required to take the Comprehensive Examination

Students must have:

  • Satisfactorily completed all required department and research methods courses and most/all of the supporting field and foundation courses,
  • Submitted the first and second year research papers, and
  • Corrected any problems as detailed in any unsatisfactory progress report letter.

 

RULES RELATED TO THE WRITTEN EXAMINATION

The written examinations are normally offered two times a year, in early Fall and early Spring each year. Any student who intends to take this during a semester should inform the PhD coordinator in writing during the first week of the semester in which he/she intends to take the exam.

 

First and Second Sittings for the Written Comprehensive Examination

Students must take the examination as soon as they are qualified.  This will normally be in the early fall of their third year.  If they do not meet the qualifications at that point, then they must complete their qualifications in time to sit for the early-spring examinations.  Failure to sit for the written examination when the student is qualified to take the examination, without written permission of the department chair, is considered a complete failure of the first sitting. This student will also be considered as making “unsatisfactory progress” in the doctoral program.

 

As noted previously the written exam will have six parts. If a student receives satisfactory evaluations on all parts of the exam in the first sitting the student will be considered to have passed the written exam. In general we anticipate that students taking the written exams will pass in the first sitting.

 

In the unlikely event that a student’s performance in one or more parts in the first sitting is “unsatisfactory” then the student will be asked to re-take those parts in a second sitting. The timing of such a second written examination will be determined by the faculty examining committee but is typically the earliest next time the written exams are scheduled. If the student receives satisfactory evaluations on all parts of the exam that they are required to take in the second sitting, the student will be considered to have passed the written exam.

 

In case of unsatisfactory performance on any portion of the partial or full exam on the second sitting the student will be asked to leave the doctoral program, but can continue taking courses to obtain a Masters degree in MIS. Failure to sit for this examination without written permission from the department chair will also be considered a failure of the second sitting.

 

RULES RELATED TO THE PAPER PRESENTATION

 

As noted above, presentation and successful defense of the second year paper will constitute the second part of the comprehensive examinations. Students are expected to schedule a presentation in the early Fall of the third year and present the paper to the faculty. The faculty will evaluate this presentation based on the quality of the presentation and the responses to questions during the presentation. In evaluating this paper and the presentation, the ISDS doctoral committee will focus primarily on the originality of the research and/or research plan, potential for current or future publication, ability to think creatively, and communicate and carry out research independently. A student will have satisfactorily completed this requirement when the doctoral committee agrees that the research paper satisfies these requirements. If a student passes the presentation then this component of the comprehensive examination will be completed. If a student receives an unsatisfactory evaluation of the presentation then the student will be given the opportunity of presenting the research a second time. The timing of such a second presentation will be determined by the doctoral committee. In case of unsatisfactory performance on this second round the student will be considered to have failed the comprehensive examinations and asked to leave the doctoral program but can continue taking courses to obtain a Masters degree in MIS.

 

5. After the Comprehensive Exams

 

Students will be “admitted to candidacy” after passing their comprehensive examinations. At this point students will be expected to form a dissertation committee and work on their dissertation proposal. After passing their proposal defense students will work to complete the dissertation and schedule a dissertation defense.  According to university rules a doctoral student must satisfactorily defend a dissertation within 4 years of candidacy.

 

AFTER THE FOURTH YEAR

After the Spring of the fourth year, College of Business and departmental financial support ends.  In order to maintain active status in the doctoral program, students must sign up for regular dissertation credit hours as required by the college and university graduate policies.

 

 

6. Performance Evaluation

An annual progress report letter will be sent to each doctoral student in the Spring of each year by the Ph.D. coordinator. Any “unsatisfactory progress” assessment will be evaluated by the Doctoral Committee for the ISDS Department. The committee may recommend one or more of several corrective actions including but not restricted to:

  • Additional coursework.
  • Additional research assignments such as a paper and/or presentation requirement.
  • Withdrawal of funding.

·         Termination from the program. In cases where a student is terminated from the doctoral program the student may be permitted to continue taking courses to obtain a Masters degree.